Central banks have been pumping money into the global economy without a whole lot to show for it other than sharply higher stock prices, and even that has been on the downturn for the past year.
Growth remains anemic, and worries are escalating that the U.S. and the rest of the world are on the brink of a recession, despite bargain-basement interest rates and trillions in liquidity.
It's all part of a phenomenon that Michael Hartnett, chief investment strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, terms “quantitative failure,” or the flip side of the quantitative easing policy the Fed and others have been employing to stimulate growth.
Harnett offered a thumbnail of just how prolific global central bank intervention has been:
- 637: Rate cuts since Bear Stearns imploded in March 2008.
- $12.3 trillion: Asset purchases through global QE programs.
- $8.3 trillion: Global debt yielding zero percent or less.
- 489 million: Population of countries with official policy rates of less than zero.
- -0.93 percent: Yield on the two-year Swiss bond, the lowest-yielding government debt in the world.
The results of those numbers:
- Expected gross domestic product growth of 1.75 percent in 2016 for the U.S., according to BofAML economist Ethan Harris.
- Inflation expectations for the U.S. and Europe now falling below financial crisis 2008 levels.
- “One of the most deflationary recoveries of all time,” according to Hartnett, with nominal GDP of advanced economies growing just 11 percent over the past 26 quarters.
- A bear market in stocks.
- A bear market in commodities.
- Loss of $686 billion in market cap for global banks since Dec. 15, the day before the Fed raised rates, leading to tightening liquidity conditions and lending standards.
- “Most conspicuously” a bear market in bank stocks and tumbling bond yields, “suggesting that six years of QE has failed to arrest deflation,” Hartnett said.
Hartnett believes the current situation most closely resembles the 1998 Long-Term Capital Management crisis, with hints of the 1937 Fed “policy mistake” that triggered the second leg down in the Great Depression and Japan's deflationary spiral in the 1990s.
In the 1937 example, the Fed is widely cited as adding to the stress of the Depression by doubling commercial bank reserve requirements. It relaxed the policy a year later and set the stage for a strong market rally prior to the beginning of World War II. This time around, the Fed announced the quarter-point rate hike that has faced criticism for being ill-timed; central bank officials recently have openly pondered going to negative rates for interest on excess bank reserves.
In the LTCM example, Harnett sees a number of parallels: “A bull market and a U.S.-led economic recovery was interrupted by a crisis in Asia (emerging markets). Other parallels to 1998 include high-yield spread widening, collapsing oil prices, peak profits, high corporate leverage and widespread financial engineering.”
For investors, getting through the central bank difficulties will be tricky. Hartnett said a bear market rally is possible, and his comments seemed on cue given Friday's market action.
But he doesn't see a true bottom until there are greater signs of market panic and the Fed eases back on its tightening plans. That probably will require a drop to 1.5 percent in the benchmark 10-year Treasury note yield (currently 1.73 percent) and a decline of the S&P 500 below 1,800 (about 3 percent from the current level).
Hartnett advises investors to stay long on cash, gold and volatility trades, while “we remain sellers of risk assets into strength,” and to stick with growth, yield and quality.
This story originally appeared in CNBC by Jeff Cox on February 12, 2016. View article here.
